Bid to limit tax powers if no-deal Brexit

Image caption Richard Harrington said MPs had to choose between Mrs May’s deal or no Brexit

MPs who do not want the UK to leave the EU without a deal will later try to limit the government’s financial powers in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

The House of Commons will vote on a cross-party amendment to the Finance Bill, which enacts the Budget.

Several senior figures back the move, but International Trade Secretary Liam Fox called it “irresponsible”.

Meanwhile, minister Richard Harrington said he is prepared to resign to stop the possibility of a no-deal Brexit.

Mr Harrington suggested to BBC Newsnight that others might follow suit, saying his position was “not an uncommon one”.

MPs will seek to turn the screw on ministers with Tuesday’s amendment, which is intended to demonstrate to the government the strength of opposition to a no-deal Brexit in the Commons.

If passed, it would mean the government would not be able to raise certain taxes and take other financial steps arising from a no deal – unless Parliament had explicitly authorised the UK leaving the EU without a deal.

The UK is scheduled to leave the EU on 29 March whether there is a deal or not.

The deal which Prime Minister Theresa May has negotiated with the EU – which covers the terms of the UK’s divorce and the framework of future relations with the EU – has not been formally approved.

A no-deal Brexit is one where the UK leaves the EU but without any agreed arrangements covering things like how trade or travel will work in the future.

Labour MP Yvette Cooper who, along with Conservative Nicky Morgan, is behind the amendment, said Parliament must act now to rule out a no deal in the event of Mrs May’s agreement being voted down next week and MPs being unable to agree any other course of action before the UK’s exit in March.

Image copyright Getty Images
Image caption Yvette Cooper says her amendment has support from Remain and Leave MPs

Writing in the Guardian, Ms Cooper said a no-deal Brexit would cause “deep and long-lasting” damage, and the country “can’t afford to play Brexit chicken and wait to see who blinks first”.

Labour have said they will back the amendment, prompting speculation that ministers will be forced to accept it in order to avoid a damaging defeat.

But Mr Fox, who backs Mrs May’s deal, said it would be “irresponsible to tie the government’s hands” at this stage by ruling out any options.

Speaking at a technology fair in California, Mr Fox said it would not take the possibility of a no-deal exit off the table.

“The government has to ensure that all eventualities are covered,” he said. “It maybe that we cannot get agreement with the EU and that we have to leave without an agreement in which case the UK has to be prepared.”

In other Brexit developments:

  • Mrs May welcomed Tory MPs to Downing Street for a drinks reception on Monday as part of her charm offensive to persuade them to back her deal
  • Opponents of Mrs May’s deal, including Boris Johnson and Iain Duncan Smith, have insisted they will not change their minds despite the drinks evening. Jacob Rees-Mogg writes in the Daily Telegraph that the public’s mood has “hardened” against the deal
  • Business lobby group London First has urged ministers to “stop the clock” on Brexit and consider the case for another referendum
  • A new government website advising consumers and businesses what to do in a no deal situation will go live on Tuesday
  • German and Irish foreign ministers are to meet to try to find a “fix” for the Irish border backstop
  • MPs write to the head of the Met Police saying they have “serious concerns” about public order and security outside Parliament, after Tory MP Anna Soubry was verbally abused outside Parliament by pro-Brexit supporters

MPs will vote on 15 January on whether to accept the legally-binding terms of withdrawal negotiated by Mrs May, as well as a framework of future relations with the EU. Five days of debate in the Commons will begin on Wednesday.

The prime minister has said the UK will be in “uncharted territory” if the deal is not accepted although she has not ruled out asking the Commons to vote on it on several times prior to the 29 March deadline.

After chairing the first cabinet meeting of 2019 later, Mrs May will meet a delegation of cross-party MPs who believe that a no-deal exit would be disastrous for British industry, more than 200 of whom have urged her to rule it out.

Image copyright EPA
Image caption Theresa May hosted Boris Johnson and other Tory MPs for drinks on Monday – but none said their minds had changed

‘PM’s deal or no Brexit’

Mr Harrington, a minister in the business department, told Newsnight he was confident that Britain would leave the EU with a deal as the stark reality facing the UK became clear.

“We will not be leaving with no deal,” he said. “I think people are beginning to realise that it’s the prime minister’s deal or there may not be a Brexit.”

Asked whether he was prepared to resign to stop a no-deal Brexit, he replied: “Definitely, I would… The prime minister knows everybody’s views and I think my view is not an uncommon one.”

Another minister, Margot James, suggested on Monday that Brexit may have to be delayed and negotiations extended under the Article 50 process if Parliament could not agree on the terms of withdrawal.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Media captionMargot James: “We might have to extend Article 50”, but would not give a timescale.

The vote on the cross-party amendment is expected at about 19:00 GMT.

Government sources warned over the weekend of “paralysis” and an effective “shutdown” if the Treasury was stripped of the power to pass regulations relating to “no-deal financial provisions” without parliamentary approval.

One leading tax expert said ministers would still be able to make tax changes by introducing new clauses into future Finance Bills or introducing emergency legislation but would find it much “more cumbersome”.

“Even if the clause were passed and there was a no-deal Brexit, the system could still function,” Andrew Hubbard, a consultant at audit, tax and consulting firm RSM said.

“But there is no doubt that if the clause were passed, it would represent a huge challenge to the authority of the government and increase further pressure to find a negotiated way out of the current deadlock.”

Related Topics

Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

Thank you for taking the time to read our article.

If you enjoyed our content, we'd really appreciate some "love" with a share or two.

And ... Don't forget to have fun!

Leave a Reply